Friday, 25 December 2015
Friday, 17 April 2015
How to Anonymize Torrenting? ExtraTorrent's Best Choice - Trust.Zone VPN
Do you know that BitTorrent and anonymity are not the same things?
If you use BitTorrent, you absolutely need to hide your identity and data. If you really want to keep your activity and downloads private, your best way involves routing your BitTorrent connection through secure internet connection.
The best way to provide you with secure and encrypted connection which hides your traffic from your ISP and government agencies is a VPN or Virtual Private Network service.
ExtraTorrent is happy to recommend Trust.Zone VPN service to create the best tool to protect your torrenting.
Trust.Zone VPN is a special tool to make you invisible while using BitTorrent or downloading any files. It hides your IP address, protects your identity and data. You will stay 100% anonymous with Trust.Zone
How Trust.Zone VPN works?
- It creates a secure tunnel between you and website (for example, torrent tracker)
- The tunnel is secure and 100% encrypted.
- Your IP address is hidden while you are browsing over the web. Your IP address is replaced by Trust.Zone VPN server ip address
- You are able to surf the web anonymously.
- Nobody can track you traffic. Download torrents, stream video and music, watch TV shows without getting caught
- ISP cannot track your activity
- Access geo-restricted content – watch country restricted YouTube video, watch BBC iPlayer, Hulu, Netflix and etc.
- Use VOIP Applications like Skype and Viber with no restrictions
- Unlimited speed and unlimited bandwidth.
- No logging
- Many VPN servers over the world.
- Available on all platforms - Windows, iOS, Android and more
- The full support of p2p, file sharing and BitTorrent
- You can use 3 VPN connections at the same time – from laptop, from home and from your office
- BitCoin accepted
ExtraTorrent reached an agreement with Trust.Zone VPN – every member of ExtraTorrent can use Trust.Zone totally for free for next 3 days. Enjoy!
ExtraTorrent warns: Protect yourself while Torrenting – Use Trust.Zone VPN
DISCUSS ON FORUM
If you use BitTorrent, you absolutely need to hide your identity and data. If you really want to keep your activity and downloads private, your best way involves routing your BitTorrent connection through secure internet connection.
The best way to provide you with secure and encrypted connection which hides your traffic from your ISP and government agencies is a VPN or Virtual Private Network service.
ExtraTorrent is happy to recommend Trust.Zone VPN service to create the best tool to protect your torrenting.
Trust.Zone VPN is a special tool to make you invisible while using BitTorrent or downloading any files. It hides your IP address, protects your identity and data. You will stay 100% anonymous with Trust.Zone
How Trust.Zone VPN works?
- It creates a secure tunnel between you and website (for example, torrent tracker)
- The tunnel is secure and 100% encrypted.
- Your IP address is hidden while you are browsing over the web. Your IP address is replaced by Trust.Zone VPN server ip address
- You are able to surf the web anonymously.
- Nobody can track you traffic. Download torrents, stream video and music, watch TV shows without getting caught
- ISP cannot track your activity
- Access geo-restricted content – watch country restricted YouTube video, watch BBC iPlayer, Hulu, Netflix and etc.
- Use VOIP Applications like Skype and Viber with no restrictions
- Unlimited speed and unlimited bandwidth.
- No logging
- Many VPN servers over the world.
- Available on all platforms - Windows, iOS, Android and more
- The full support of p2p, file sharing and BitTorrent
- You can use 3 VPN connections at the same time – from laptop, from home and from your office
- BitCoin accepted
ExtraTorrent reached an agreement with Trust.Zone VPN – every member of ExtraTorrent can use Trust.Zone totally for free for next 3 days. Enjoy!
ExtraTorrent warns: Protect yourself while Torrenting – Use Trust.Zone VPN
DISCUSS ON FORUM
Tech Giants Shift Revenues from Australia
Google, Microsoft and Apple have all defended corporate structures that provided for shifting most of the taxable revenue to offshore jurisdictions. News Corp Australia asked senators to impose a goods and services tax on its competitor Netflix. In response, the largest tech firms in the world had to defend themselves and their tax schemes. Google’s branch in Australia and New Zealand refused to disclose its Australian revenues, but revealed that in 2013 the company had paid $7.1m in tax on $46m in profits. However, most of its local revenue was taxed in Singapore, as the Australian branch of the company provides sales and marketing services to Singapore branch.
Microsoft revealed that last year the company had also shifted about $2bn to Singapore in revenue from Australia, declaring only $100m in the country, over the same reason – the company explained that products and services are sold to Australia by Microsoft’s Singapore group, with sales staff being located in Singapore, and Microsoft’s clients being billed by the Singapore branch as well.
Finally, Apple confirmed it had paid about $80m in income tax in Australia – from revenue of more than $6bn. However, Apple doesn’t agree that this amounts to aggressive tax planning.
The tax office is auditing the three companies at the moment, and this is no surprise – they couldn’t expect Australia to like being not paid taxes, could they? In the meantime, the local authorities suggested a so-called “Google tax” in the budget to require multinationals to pay a higher rate. In response, Google suggested that Australian tax breaks for research and development should be spent in smaller start-ups instead of such giants as Google and its fellows.
Microsoft revealed that last year the company had also shifted about $2bn to Singapore in revenue from Australia, declaring only $100m in the country, over the same reason – the company explained that products and services are sold to Australia by Microsoft’s Singapore group, with sales staff being located in Singapore, and Microsoft’s clients being billed by the Singapore branch as well.
Finally, Apple confirmed it had paid about $80m in income tax in Australia – from revenue of more than $6bn. However, Apple doesn’t agree that this amounts to aggressive tax planning.
The tax office is auditing the three companies at the moment, and this is no surprise – they couldn’t expect Australia to like being not paid taxes, could they? In the meantime, the local authorities suggested a so-called “Google tax” in the budget to require multinationals to pay a higher rate. In response, Google suggested that Australian tax breaks for research and development should be spent in smaller start-ups instead of such giants as Google and its fellows.
DEA Accused of Collection of Phone Records
Human rights groups are ready to file a federal lawsuit over the mass collection of US phone records – this time, against the Drug Enforcement Agency. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles federal court demanding to stop the DEA from collecting records of people’s international calls without a warrant.
Data collecting program lasted for 20 years and became a template for the NSA’s mass surveillance of US phone data after 9/11. Despite the fact that the US officials claimed that the DEA was not collecting information anymore, the news that the agency collected phone records in the so-called “war on drugs” inspired new questions.
EFF alleged that the mass surveillance puts the work of privacy outfits in jeopardy. For instance, Human Rights Watch works with people who can be in life-or-death situations and speaking out can make them a target. This is why the lawsuit claims that the US government is secretly stretching its surveillance authorities to the breaking point.
It turned out that a number of US presidents secretly allowed the Drug Enforcement Agency to monitor and store phone data that included almost all telephone calls from the United States linked to drug trafficking. Since 1992, the so-called “USTO” program ran without judicial approval, although this was required by the US constitution.
By the way, it seems that the warrantless mass phone records collection has failed to stop the growth of domestic drugs consumption. For example, in 2012, 9.2 % of Americans had consumed narcotics in the past month, up from 8.3% in 2002 – this is despite the efforts of the US, which spends billions on drug eradication abroad –more than $9bn was spent in Colombia and $7.5bn in Afghanistan.
Data collecting program lasted for 20 years and became a template for the NSA’s mass surveillance of US phone data after 9/11. Despite the fact that the US officials claimed that the DEA was not collecting information anymore, the news that the agency collected phone records in the so-called “war on drugs” inspired new questions.
EFF alleged that the mass surveillance puts the work of privacy outfits in jeopardy. For instance, Human Rights Watch works with people who can be in life-or-death situations and speaking out can make them a target. This is why the lawsuit claims that the US government is secretly stretching its surveillance authorities to the breaking point.
It turned out that a number of US presidents secretly allowed the Drug Enforcement Agency to monitor and store phone data that included almost all telephone calls from the United States linked to drug trafficking. Since 1992, the so-called “USTO” program ran without judicial approval, although this was required by the US constitution.
By the way, it seems that the warrantless mass phone records collection has failed to stop the growth of domestic drugs consumption. For example, in 2012, 9.2 % of Americans had consumed narcotics in the past month, up from 8.3% in 2002 – this is despite the efforts of the US, which spends billions on drug eradication abroad –more than $9bn was spent in Colombia and $7.5bn in Afghanistan.
Australian Court Determines Level of Fines in Piracy Case
A local court is going to assess how the copyright owners deal with people pirating Dallas Buyers Club due to fears that they were trolling alleged pirates to extort settlements.
In the case launched by Voltage Pictures, the court delivered a landmark ruling a few days ago, according to which a number of Australia’s largest ISPs were forced to reveal personal details of over 4,700 users suspected of sharing the Oscar-winning movie online via BitTorrent and other services.
But this is not an unconditional victory: an Australian justice will decide how much money the movie studio can demand from the suspects. The court required the plaintiffs to submit a draft of a letter they are going to send to identified file-sharers. Another stipulation of the court decision was that the identities of the Internet subscriber remain confidential.
A few months ago, the largest broadband providers in the country refused to hand over personal details, calling previous requests of Voltage Pictures “speculative invoicing” ahead of the lawsuit. The ISPs claimed that the copyright owners were using discovery letters to threaten Internet users into making settlements.
In the meantime, Voltage Pictures is known as a smaller, independent movie company, with its recent releases including Don Jon, Killer Joe and Thanks for Sharing. The company has also aggressively pursued copyright infringement cases in the United States and Denmark.
In the United States, with the help of the US Internet service providers, the company obtained names and IP addresses of people who had illegally downloaded the movie and filed suit against them threatening with a fine of up to $150,000. Suspected pirates have usually settled out of court for around $5,000.
Entertainment industry has responded forcefully to the increase in digital piracy, but many copyright owners simply ask the broadband providers to forward their users a written warning. However, some adult content distributors including the Io Group have aggressively pursued the lawsuit strategy with great success – they even provided convenient PayPal and credit card options in those threatening “notification” letters.
In other countries – for example, Canada, – ISPs have chosen to throttle P2P traffic – in other words, they slowed down the Internet connections of people using the Internet to access potentially illegal files via P2P services.
In the case launched by Voltage Pictures, the court delivered a landmark ruling a few days ago, according to which a number of Australia’s largest ISPs were forced to reveal personal details of over 4,700 users suspected of sharing the Oscar-winning movie online via BitTorrent and other services.
But this is not an unconditional victory: an Australian justice will decide how much money the movie studio can demand from the suspects. The court required the plaintiffs to submit a draft of a letter they are going to send to identified file-sharers. Another stipulation of the court decision was that the identities of the Internet subscriber remain confidential.
A few months ago, the largest broadband providers in the country refused to hand over personal details, calling previous requests of Voltage Pictures “speculative invoicing” ahead of the lawsuit. The ISPs claimed that the copyright owners were using discovery letters to threaten Internet users into making settlements.
In the meantime, Voltage Pictures is known as a smaller, independent movie company, with its recent releases including Don Jon, Killer Joe and Thanks for Sharing. The company has also aggressively pursued copyright infringement cases in the United States and Denmark.
In the United States, with the help of the US Internet service providers, the company obtained names and IP addresses of people who had illegally downloaded the movie and filed suit against them threatening with a fine of up to $150,000. Suspected pirates have usually settled out of court for around $5,000.
Entertainment industry has responded forcefully to the increase in digital piracy, but many copyright owners simply ask the broadband providers to forward their users a written warning. However, some adult content distributors including the Io Group have aggressively pursued the lawsuit strategy with great success – they even provided convenient PayPal and credit card options in those threatening “notification” letters.
In other countries – for example, Canada, – ISPs have chosen to throttle P2P traffic – in other words, they slowed down the Internet connections of people using the Internet to access potentially illegal files via P2P services.
YouTube Kids App Accused of Unfair Practices
YouTube Kids App Accused of Unfair Practices
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) received a complaint where privacy watchdogs accused Google of using unfair and deceptive marketing practices in its YouTube Kids app. It turned out that the app’s video selection contained material that parents could believe their kids would not access.
The complaint argues that Google blurs the line between advertising and programming for children. It claims that children are exposed to an endless stream of video content that may not disclose that they actually have deals with product makers.
YouTube Kids app was introduced a few weeks ago, positioned as the first product of the company designed from the ground up with children in mind. But the consumer rights groups argue that Google mixes and matches advertising and programming which can’t be done, for instance, on broadcast and cable television.
In addition, the complaint filed to FTC also alleges that YouTube violates its own advertising guidelines. For example, the company’s Advertising on YouTube Kids page reads that products related to consumable food and drinks are banned, while the stream of watchable videos includes a McDonald’s channel, marked “promotional consideration provided by McDonald’s”.
Industry observers point out that regulators often investigate advertising aimed at kids online. For instance, a few months ago, Yelp and TinyCo paid almost half million dollars to settle a case where they were accused of collecting personal information without explicit parental permission.
In response, a YouTube spokesperson explained that when developing the service for kids, the company consulted with numerous partners and child advocacy and privacy groups. Google claims it is always open to feedback on ways to improve the application for children.
The complaint argues that Google blurs the line between advertising and programming for children. It claims that children are exposed to an endless stream of video content that may not disclose that they actually have deals with product makers.
YouTube Kids app was introduced a few weeks ago, positioned as the first product of the company designed from the ground up with children in mind. But the consumer rights groups argue that Google mixes and matches advertising and programming which can’t be done, for instance, on broadcast and cable television.
In addition, the complaint filed to FTC also alleges that YouTube violates its own advertising guidelines. For example, the company’s Advertising on YouTube Kids page reads that products related to consumable food and drinks are banned, while the stream of watchable videos includes a McDonald’s channel, marked “promotional consideration provided by McDonald’s”.
Industry observers point out that regulators often investigate advertising aimed at kids online. For instance, a few months ago, Yelp and TinyCo paid almost half million dollars to settle a case where they were accused of collecting personal information without explicit parental permission.
In response, a YouTube spokesperson explained that when developing the service for kids, the company consulted with numerous partners and child advocacy and privacy groups. Google claims it is always open to feedback on ways to improve the application for children.
Monday, 13 April 2015
Turkish Authorities Banned Social media, Again
Under the Turkish court ruling, access to the social media sites including YouTube, Twitter and Facebook was temporarily banned over the publication of images showing a prosecutor kidnapped by far-left militants in the capital of the country.
Mehmet Selim Kiraz was killed when security forces stormed the office in the Istanbul courthouse where far-left militants had taken him hostage. They published a picture of Kiraz held at gunpoint on social media. So, the social media ban arrived after a demand to block 166 websites that posted those pictures, including direct links to Turkish newspapers, 7 of which now face a criminal investigation for publishing the photo of Kiraz.
It became known that ban on Facebook was lifted after the company quickly complied with the court ruling. Then the ban on Twitter was also lifted when it removed the controversial images. As for the ban on YouTube, it remained, with the court ordering Google to also remove material on this story to avoid blockage. Turkish authorities confirmed that the procedure would continue and that all ISPs would be ordered to implement the ban rapidly.
It should be mentioned that once the Twitter ban came into effect, the hashtag #TwitterisblockedinTurkey became the top trending term globally. Of course, the local users quickly found a way to circumvent the ban – some of them actually learned that Twitter is blocked from… Twitter.
You may remember that Turkey has blocked social media before – in the runup to local elections a year ago, the country also blocked access to both Twitter and YouTube for publishing audio recordings alleging corruption in the country’s government.
Turkish Internet users learned the way to bypass the ban by heart now: for example, they use virtual private networks that allow to connect to the web undetected. Another way is to change the domain name settings to conceal the geolocation.
As usual, the ban caused widespread outrage all over the world. In response, a presidential spokesman defended the ban, saying that the ruling was passed only because some media outlets “spread terrorist propaganda” by publishing the controversial pictures. This is why the prosecutor’s office demanded that this image not be used anywhere on the Internet.
Mehmet Selim Kiraz was killed when security forces stormed the office in the Istanbul courthouse where far-left militants had taken him hostage. They published a picture of Kiraz held at gunpoint on social media. So, the social media ban arrived after a demand to block 166 websites that posted those pictures, including direct links to Turkish newspapers, 7 of which now face a criminal investigation for publishing the photo of Kiraz.
It became known that ban on Facebook was lifted after the company quickly complied with the court ruling. Then the ban on Twitter was also lifted when it removed the controversial images. As for the ban on YouTube, it remained, with the court ordering Google to also remove material on this story to avoid blockage. Turkish authorities confirmed that the procedure would continue and that all ISPs would be ordered to implement the ban rapidly.
It should be mentioned that once the Twitter ban came into effect, the hashtag #TwitterisblockedinTurkey became the top trending term globally. Of course, the local users quickly found a way to circumvent the ban – some of them actually learned that Twitter is blocked from… Twitter.
You may remember that Turkey has blocked social media before – in the runup to local elections a year ago, the country also blocked access to both Twitter and YouTube for publishing audio recordings alleging corruption in the country’s government.
Turkish Internet users learned the way to bypass the ban by heart now: for example, they use virtual private networks that allow to connect to the web undetected. Another way is to change the domain name settings to conceal the geolocation.
As usual, the ban caused widespread outrage all over the world. In response, a presidential spokesman defended the ban, saying that the ruling was passed only because some media outlets “spread terrorist propaganda” by publishing the controversial pictures. This is why the prosecutor’s office demanded that this image not be used anywhere on the Internet.
Airbnb Launched in Cuba
Airbnb, a leading home-rental company, has finally brought the sharing economy born in capitalism to communist Cuba. Obama’s move to relax cold war-era travel restrictions influenced the online development of the country. Airbnb was quick to benefit from such opportunities and started to cooperate with Cuba’s many hosts who have long rented out homes and rooms to foreign guests.
The Cuban government always encouraged private homes to serve tourists in order to promote tourism without the costs of hotels. After cooperating with them, Airbnb can launch services in Cuba with more than 1,000 listings, which include everything from colonial homes to terraced bedrooms and spare rooms in normal homes. The price is very attractive – usually less than $50. Although the hosts have to pay Airbnb a fraction of their fees, they expand to previously nonexistent marketplace in return.
The matter is that Cubans got used to a perpetually broken phone system and rare and expensive access to the Internet. This is why it turned out that Airbnb has jumped first into a unique and virtually empty market – in contrast to other companies, who can only provide phone numbers and emails for Cuban rentals, Airbnb books reservations right away.
Airbnb also revealed that it saw a 70% rise in searches for listings in Cuba after Obama’s move in January. Apparently, the company has an opportunity to start fresh in Cuba with a government newly open to US businesses. At the moment, its services in Cuba are available only to Americans because of the US trade embargo which prohibits offering listings to others.
By the way, other travel companies also show interest in offering services in Cuba: for example, flight and hotel website Kayak and the airliner Sun Country, which launched charter flights from New York to Havana. Netflix, a popular streaming service, also announced the launch of its services in the country.
The Cuban government always encouraged private homes to serve tourists in order to promote tourism without the costs of hotels. After cooperating with them, Airbnb can launch services in Cuba with more than 1,000 listings, which include everything from colonial homes to terraced bedrooms and spare rooms in normal homes. The price is very attractive – usually less than $50. Although the hosts have to pay Airbnb a fraction of their fees, they expand to previously nonexistent marketplace in return.
The matter is that Cubans got used to a perpetually broken phone system and rare and expensive access to the Internet. This is why it turned out that Airbnb has jumped first into a unique and virtually empty market – in contrast to other companies, who can only provide phone numbers and emails for Cuban rentals, Airbnb books reservations right away.
Airbnb also revealed that it saw a 70% rise in searches for listings in Cuba after Obama’s move in January. Apparently, the company has an opportunity to start fresh in Cuba with a government newly open to US businesses. At the moment, its services in Cuba are available only to Americans because of the US trade embargo which prohibits offering listings to others.
By the way, other travel companies also show interest in offering services in Cuba: for example, flight and hotel website Kayak and the airliner Sun Country, which launched charter flights from New York to Havana. Netflix, a popular streaming service, also announced the launch of its services in the country.
Administrator of Revenge Porn Site Sentenced to 18 Years
Kevin Bollaert, 28, who operated a so-called “revenge porn” online service and then extorted cash from victims to remove nude images and personal data, was recently sentenced to 18 years in state prison. The individual from San Diego was convicted of 21 counts of identity theft plus 6 counts of extortion for operating a number of online services that capitalized on the worldwide web as a place for public shaming.
Kevin Bollaert created a website called ugotposted.com, where jilted lovers and hackers could publish nude photos and personal data of people, including names, addresses and social media details, without their consent, while remaining anonymous. Over 10,000 images, mainly of women, were uploaded to the website between December 2012 and September 2013. When victims of such behavior sought to have the embarrassing images taken down, they were directed to other website operated by Bollaert – changemyreputation.com – where they were charged up to $350 to remove the images.
The court sentenced Kevin Bollaert to as long as 18 years because the compromising images cost many people jobs, damaged relationships and even attempted suicide. In the meantime, the individual earned about $900 per month in advertising revenue from his site and, of course, collected quite much from the victims (around $30,000).
In attempt to defend his client, Bollaert’s lawyer was trying to insist at the court that although his business was indeed gross and offensive, Kevin Bollaert didn’t break any law, because he was not posting any pictures himself – instead, he allowed other Internet users to upload the explicit content.
Kevin Bollaert created a website called ugotposted.com, where jilted lovers and hackers could publish nude photos and personal data of people, including names, addresses and social media details, without their consent, while remaining anonymous. Over 10,000 images, mainly of women, were uploaded to the website between December 2012 and September 2013. When victims of such behavior sought to have the embarrassing images taken down, they were directed to other website operated by Bollaert – changemyreputation.com – where they were charged up to $350 to remove the images.
The court sentenced Kevin Bollaert to as long as 18 years because the compromising images cost many people jobs, damaged relationships and even attempted suicide. In the meantime, the individual earned about $900 per month in advertising revenue from his site and, of course, collected quite much from the victims (around $30,000).
In attempt to defend his client, Bollaert’s lawyer was trying to insist at the court that although his business was indeed gross and offensive, Kevin Bollaert didn’t break any law, because he was not posting any pictures himself – instead, he allowed other Internet users to upload the explicit content.
Friday, 9 January 2015
Thursday, 8 January 2015
AADAAB E ZINDAGI آداب ذندگی URDU eBook Downloading File
AADAAB E ZINDAGI آداب ذندگی URDU eBook Downloading File
Iski Downloading File fil hall torrent main hai torrent ko download karna ka lia torrent ki picture par click karin
Iski Downloading File fil hall torrent main hai torrent ko download karna ka lia torrent ki picture par click karin
Saturday, 3 January 2015
Friday, 2 January 2015
Tuesday, 30 December 2014
Far Cry 4 torrent
ABOUT THE GAME
Hidden in the towering Himalayas lies Kyrat, a country steeped in tradition and violence. You are Ajay Ghale. Traveling to Kyrat to fulfill your mother’s dying wish, you find yourself caught up in a civil war to overthrow the oppressive regime of dictator Pagan Min. Explore and navigate this vast open world, where danger and unpredictability lurk around every corner. Here, every decision counts, and every second is a story. Welcome to Kyrat.
FEATURES
• EXPLORE AN OPEN WORLD FILLED WITH POSSIBILITIES
Discover the most diverse Far Cry world ever created. With terrain spanning from lush forests to the snowcapped Himalayas, the entire world is alive…and deadly.
- From leopards, rhinos, black eagles, and vicious honey badgers, Kyrat is home to abundant wildlife. As you embark on your hunt for resources, know that something may be hunting you…
- Scout enemy territory from above in the all-new gyrocopter and then plummet back to earth in your wing suit. Climb aboard the back of a six-ton elephant and unleash its raw power on your enemies.
- Choose the right weapon for the job, no matter how insane or unpredictable that job might be. With a diverse arsenal, you’ll be prepared for anything.
• CO-OP: BRING A FRIEND
Not every journey should be taken alone. Far Cry 4 allows for a second player to drop in and drop out at any point, re-imagining the cooperative experience in the true spirit of Far Cry for the next generation. You’ll now be able to discover and explore the living open world of Kyrat together.
Title: Far Cry® 4
Genre: Action, Adventure
Developer: Ubisoft Montreal, Red Storm, Shanghai, Toronto, Kiev
Publisher: Ubisoft
Release Date: Nov 18, 2014
Minimum
Supported OS
Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8/8.1 (64bit versions only)
Processor
Intel Core i5-750 @ 2.6 GHz or AMD Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.2 GHz
Memory
4GB
Video Card
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 or AMD Radeon HD5850 (1GB VRAM)
Direct X
Version 11
Hard Drive
30 GB available space
Sound Card
DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card with latest drivers
Optimal
Supported OS
MS Windows 7 SP1, MS Windows 8/8.1 (64bit versions only)
Processor
Intel Core i5-2400S @ 2.5 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz or better
Memory
8GB
Video Card
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 or AMD Radeon R9 290X or better (2GB VRAM)
Direct X
Version 11
Hard Drive
30 GB available space
Sound Card
DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card with latest drivers
1. Unpack the release
2. Mount or burn image
3. Install
4. Copy everything folder into the game installation
5. Block the game in your firewall and mark our cracked content as
secure/trusted in your antivirus program
6. Play the game
7. Support the companies, which software you actually enjoy!
Call of Duty Advanced Warfare RELOADED torrent
ABOUT THE GAME
Call of Duty®: Advanced Warfare, developed by Sledgehammer Games (co-developers of Call of Duty®: Modern Warfare® 3), harnesses the first three-year, all next-gen development cycle in franchise history. Call of Duty®: Advanced Warfare envisions a powerful future, where both technology and tactics have evolved to usher in a new era of combat for the franchise. Delivering a stunning performance, Academy Award® winning actor Kevin Spacey stars as Jonathan Irons – one of the most powerful men in the world – shaping this chilling vision of the future of war.
All digital purchases of Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare include the bonus Digital Edition Personalization Pack with a custom weapon camo, reticle set and playercard.
Power Changes Everything.
FEATURES
An Advanced World:
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare takes place in a plausible future in which technological progress and today’s military practices have converged with powerful consequences.
In this carefully researched and crafted vision, Private Military Corporations (PMCs) have become the dominant armed forces for countless nations outsourcing their military needs, redrawing borders and rewriting the rules of war.
And Jonathan Irons, the founder and president of the world’s largest PMC – Atlas Corporation – is at the center of it all.
An Advanced Soldier:
Powerful exoskeletons evolve every aspect of a soldier’s battle readiness, enabling combatants to deploy with an advanced lethality and eliminating the need for specialization.
The introduction of this gameplay mechanic delivers enhanced player movement and verticality through boost jumps and grappling, covert cloaking abilities, and biomechanics that provide unparalleled strength, awareness, endurance, and speed.
With the advent of the exoskeleton and newly advanced armor and weaponry, every soldier commands tactical freedom in any terrain unlike ever before, fundamentally changing the way gamers play Call of Duty across all modes.
An Advanced Arsenal:
Harnessing the power of next-gen platforms, Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare introduces a new hi-tech, advanced arsenal and ability set, arming players with all-new equipment, technology, perks, and vehicles like hoverbikes and highly specialized drones.
Players can also choose between standard ammunition and an all-new class of directed-energy weaponry that enables totally new gameplay dynamics.
And with exoskeletons delivering a massive force multiplier and unprecedented tactical freedom, Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare evolves every firefight.
Title: Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
Genre: Action
Developer: Sledgehammer Games , Raven Software
Publisher: Activision
Minimum:
OS: Windows 7 64-Bit / Windows 8 64-Bit / Windows 8.1 64-Bit
Processor: Intel® Core™ i3-530 @ 2.93 GHz / AMD Phenom™ II X4 810 @ 2.60 GHz
Memory: 6 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTS 450 @ 1GB / ATI® Radeon™ HD 5870 @ 1GB
DirectX: Version 11
Network: Broadband Internet connection
Hard Drive: 55 GB available space
Sound Card: DirectX Compatible
Additional Notes: Field of View ranges from 65°-90°.
Recommended:
OS: Windows 7 64-Bit / Windows 8 64-Bit / Windows 8.1 64-Bit
Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz
Memory: 8 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 760 @ 4GB
DirectX: Version 11
Network: Broadband Internet connection
Hard Drive: 55 GB available space
Sound Card: 100% DirectX 9.0c Compatible 16-bit
Additional Notes: Field of View ranges from 65°-90°.
- Extract
- Burn or mount the .iso
- Run setup.exe and install
- copy crack dir to installdir
- Play
Australia to Introduce Bitcoin Tax
Tax authorities of the country have decided that operations with Bitcoin are subject to the Goods and Services Tax and suggested that the cryptocurrency should not be classified as “money”. This will mainly affect Australian businesses that accept and change Bitcoins, providing service for customers who want to trade real money for the digital currency. Now, when Bitcoin is bought from an exchange, the latter will have to pay tax on the supply of the cryptocurrency.
Goods and Services Tax doesn’t normally apply to financial transactions, i.e. a conventional money exchange won’t have to pay it when Australians buy foreign currency. So, the application of this tax to Bitcoin will make running a Bitcoin exchange in the country an expensive proposition, because it is due on the total amount of cryptocurrency supplied, not on the cut the service takes above the market value.
Nevertheless, the way an exchange operates in reality will make a difference. Apparently, Bitcoin “trading platforms” will be liable for much less tax under the new rules, with a difference being in whether the firm buys and sells Bitcoin itself, or simply facilitates transactions between 3rd parties like a stock exchange. In the latter case, the tax is only due on the percentage commission the service charges, rather than on the total amount purchased.
In the meantime, the decision will also complicate operations involving spending Bitcoin, as it would require sellers accepting the cryptocurrency to treat it as a “taxable supply”, unlike money exchanged for goods and services. Tax authorities justified treating Bitcoin in this way by the fact that the cryptocurrency is not a legally recognized universal means of exchange and form of payment by the laws of any country – in other words, it is not currency and therefore not money.
Goods and Services Tax doesn’t normally apply to financial transactions, i.e. a conventional money exchange won’t have to pay it when Australians buy foreign currency. So, the application of this tax to Bitcoin will make running a Bitcoin exchange in the country an expensive proposition, because it is due on the total amount of cryptocurrency supplied, not on the cut the service takes above the market value.
Nevertheless, the way an exchange operates in reality will make a difference. Apparently, Bitcoin “trading platforms” will be liable for much less tax under the new rules, with a difference being in whether the firm buys and sells Bitcoin itself, or simply facilitates transactions between 3rd parties like a stock exchange. In the latter case, the tax is only due on the percentage commission the service charges, rather than on the total amount purchased.
In the meantime, the decision will also complicate operations involving spending Bitcoin, as it would require sellers accepting the cryptocurrency to treat it as a “taxable supply”, unlike money exchanged for goods and services. Tax authorities justified treating Bitcoin in this way by the fact that the cryptocurrency is not a legally recognized universal means of exchange and form of payment by the laws of any country – in other words, it is not currency and therefore not money.
Apple Investigated in Canada over iPhone Sales
The tech giant has been ordered to hand over papers to the Canadian Competition Bureau. The agency investigates into whether Apple used unfair tactics to boost iPhone sales in the country, pointing out that the agreements Apple concluded with mobile networks could have encouraged the operators to increase the prices of rival phones.
Thanks to huge consumer demand for the iPhone, its manufacture got considerable bargaining power when negotiating contracts with mobile operators. Now the Competition Bureau thinks that Apple has abused its position.
Apple was given 3 months to provide all the documents to the agency, including the deals reached with Canadian mobile operators. In the meantime, agency pointed out that it was possible the tech giant could challenge of the right of Canadian courts to force its Canadian subsidiary to provide records held by the American parent company. On the other hand, the Canadian competition law enables the local courts to compel the production of documents held abroad.
Back in 2013, the European Commission made a similar step, sending out a questionnaire to mobile network operators trying to find out Apple’s sales tactics with iPhones. The Commission claimed it had information that the company may have colluded with mobile network operators, which could have potentially led to the foreclosure of other smartphone manufacturers from the markets. The investigation was ignited by complaints from networks about the contracts that had been struck with the company. In result, no anti-trust investigation was started.
Apple has recently won another long-lasting lawsuit concerning iPods and iTunes, where it was accused of preventing the use of competing music players by consumers.
Thanks to huge consumer demand for the iPhone, its manufacture got considerable bargaining power when negotiating contracts with mobile operators. Now the Competition Bureau thinks that Apple has abused its position.
Apple was given 3 months to provide all the documents to the agency, including the deals reached with Canadian mobile operators. In the meantime, agency pointed out that it was possible the tech giant could challenge of the right of Canadian courts to force its Canadian subsidiary to provide records held by the American parent company. On the other hand, the Canadian competition law enables the local courts to compel the production of documents held abroad.
Back in 2013, the European Commission made a similar step, sending out a questionnaire to mobile network operators trying to find out Apple’s sales tactics with iPhones. The Commission claimed it had information that the company may have colluded with mobile network operators, which could have potentially led to the foreclosure of other smartphone manufacturers from the markets. The investigation was ignited by complaints from networks about the contracts that had been struck with the company. In result, no anti-trust investigation was started.
Apple has recently won another long-lasting lawsuit concerning iPods and iTunes, where it was accused of preventing the use of competing music players by consumers.
Hollywood Tries to Revive SOPA
Hollywood was accused by Google of trying to revive the failed Stop Online Piracy Act, which was supposed to enable wholesale website filtering. Google claims that Hollywood studios, via the MPAA, decided to push through the effects of SOPA using non-legislative measures. The search giant alleges that the MPAA led a secret, coordinated campaign to revive the failed bill and helped bring legal arguments in connection with a recent court investigation.
As you might know, SOPA was a legislation put before the US House of Representatives supposed to significantly expand the powers of American authorities to fight Internet trafficking in copyrighted and counterfeited goods.
SOPA gave rights owners the power to request court orders to forbid advertising networks including Google and payment facilities from doing business with infringing websites. Copyright owners could also ban search engines from linking to infringing websites and receive court orders that demand ISPs to block access to those online services.
However, this bill was defeated two years ago despite the backing of the MPAA thanks to a public outcry, which prompted about 115,000 sites, including Google, to protest against SOPA. A petition against the bill was signed by 10 million people; 8 million made phone calls to Congress, and 4 million sent emails.
Now Google points at news reports accusing the movie outfit and 6 studios of colluding in order to start a new campaign intended to secretly revive SOPA. The search giant alleges that the industry is trying to achieve wholesale website blocking by convincing state prosecutors to take up the fight against the company.
In the meantime, in the United Kingdom, the rights owners are able to seek court orders in order to force broadband providers to block access to online portals they deem as infringing copyright. Such portals as The Pirate Bay have been blocked in the country since 2012.
According to media reports, the movie studios allocated $500,000 annually for legal support, which was increased to $1.175 million for this campaign.
Google is particularly disappointed with what this all means for the Motion Picture Association of America itself, a group founded in part to promote and defend the First Amendment and artists’ right to free expression, which is now for some reason trying to secretly censor the web.
As you might know, SOPA was a legislation put before the US House of Representatives supposed to significantly expand the powers of American authorities to fight Internet trafficking in copyrighted and counterfeited goods.
SOPA gave rights owners the power to request court orders to forbid advertising networks including Google and payment facilities from doing business with infringing websites. Copyright owners could also ban search engines from linking to infringing websites and receive court orders that demand ISPs to block access to those online services.
However, this bill was defeated two years ago despite the backing of the MPAA thanks to a public outcry, which prompted about 115,000 sites, including Google, to protest against SOPA. A petition against the bill was signed by 10 million people; 8 million made phone calls to Congress, and 4 million sent emails.
Now Google points at news reports accusing the movie outfit and 6 studios of colluding in order to start a new campaign intended to secretly revive SOPA. The search giant alleges that the industry is trying to achieve wholesale website blocking by convincing state prosecutors to take up the fight against the company.
In the meantime, in the United Kingdom, the rights owners are able to seek court orders in order to force broadband providers to block access to online portals they deem as infringing copyright. Such portals as The Pirate Bay have been blocked in the country since 2012.
According to media reports, the movie studios allocated $500,000 annually for legal support, which was increased to $1.175 million for this campaign.
Google is particularly disappointed with what this all means for the Motion Picture Association of America itself, a group founded in part to promote and defend the First Amendment and artists’ right to free expression, which is now for some reason trying to secretly censor the web.
Monday, 29 December 2014
Celebrities Lost Millions of Instagram Followers
Famous photo-sharing app Instagram has recently scrubbed multiple spam accounts and bots. As a result, many accounts of celebrities lost thousands or even millions of followers in just a few hours.
For example, Justin Bieber lost as many as 3.5 million followers, hip-hop star Akon – about 56% of his Instagram chums. Other artists also suffered: rappers Tyga and Ma$e lost 1.5 million followers. Kim Kardashian shed some 1.3 million followers. Of course, most of the celebrities and civilian Instagrammers didn’t like their free-falling follower count, but others reveled in the massacre.
The company explained that it had to delete accounts that posted links and spam – mostly bot accounts. As you know, online bots are nothing more than software apps that perform automated or semi-automated tasks. It should be noted that there are more bots out there than there are people on Earth.
You might have noticed the adverts of the companies that promised the opportunity to buy a bunch of followers on social networking websites like Twitter, Instagram and Vine so that you would seem more popular. They usually “sell” bot followers. As you can understand, their services are now a risky investment, because you can lose all of those “bought” followers overnight. In addition, Instagram’s latest move means that people making money from sponsored publications thanks to their large follower count also stand to lose out.
The photo-sharing app, owned by Facebook, recognized that spamming was a huge problem. Instagram said that after receiving feedback from members in the Instagram community, they had to fix an issue, which incorrectly included inactive accounts in follower/following lists. By the way, the Instagram’s own account lost the most followers – 18 million.
For example, Justin Bieber lost as many as 3.5 million followers, hip-hop star Akon – about 56% of his Instagram chums. Other artists also suffered: rappers Tyga and Ma$e lost 1.5 million followers. Kim Kardashian shed some 1.3 million followers. Of course, most of the celebrities and civilian Instagrammers didn’t like their free-falling follower count, but others reveled in the massacre.
The company explained that it had to delete accounts that posted links and spam – mostly bot accounts. As you know, online bots are nothing more than software apps that perform automated or semi-automated tasks. It should be noted that there are more bots out there than there are people on Earth.
You might have noticed the adverts of the companies that promised the opportunity to buy a bunch of followers on social networking websites like Twitter, Instagram and Vine so that you would seem more popular. They usually “sell” bot followers. As you can understand, their services are now a risky investment, because you can lose all of those “bought” followers overnight. In addition, Instagram’s latest move means that people making money from sponsored publications thanks to their large follower count also stand to lose out.
The photo-sharing app, owned by Facebook, recognized that spamming was a huge problem. Instagram said that after receiving feedback from members in the Instagram community, they had to fix an issue, which incorrectly included inactive accounts in follower/following lists. By the way, the Instagram’s own account lost the most followers – 18 million.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
